โ€• Advertisement โ€•

Tesla’s Global Sales Drop Masks a Hidden Victory in China

For the first time in over a decade, Tesla experienced a year-over-year decline in global vehicle deliveries. In 2024, Tesla delivered 1,789,226 electric vehicles...

A new sales king in town?

HomeWatchesSamsung Galaxy Ring causes controversy: the mistake that could cost it dearly

Samsung Galaxy Ring causes controversy: the mistake that could cost it dearly

Samsung is set to launch its first-ever smart ring, the Galaxy Ring. But a controversial decision could well hamper its success. Find out why Samsung's choice is causing controversy and likely to divide users.

A promising innovation in the world of wearables

The Samsung Galaxy Ring is shaping up to be one of the brand's biggest launches this year. This small connected device is worn on the finger and promises to monitor various health parameters:

  • Cardiac frequency
  • Sleep quality
  • Energy score
  • Samsung thus becomes the first major smartphone manufacturer to launch itself on the connected ring market, until now dominated by more confidential brands like Oura.

    Limited compatibility that makes people cringe

    However, a decision by Samsung is already causing controversy: the Galaxy Ring will not be compatible with iOS. Only Android users will be able to enjoy this new accessory, provided they install the Samsung Health app.

    This restriction raises many questions:

  • Why deliberately exclude iPhone users?
  • Shouldn't smart rings be accessible to everyone?
  • Isn't Samsung depriving itself of a significant share of the market?
  • An open market so far

    Unlike Samsung's choice, most current smart rings are compatible with iOS and Android:

  • Oura Ring
  • Circular Ring Slim
  • Ultrahuman Ring Air
  • RingConn Smart Ring
  • Even the Evie Ring, initially limited to iOS, has announced future Android compatibility.

    A missed opportunity for Samsung?

    By excluding iPhone users, Samsung is potentially missing out on half of its target customers. This decision seems all the more surprising given that:

  • A smart ring has no screen and does not run a complex operating system.
  • The connection is made simply via Bluetooth
  • No proprietary software is involved in the ring itself
  • The possible consequences of this choice

    This restriction could have several negative impacts for Samsung:

  • Limiting Galaxy Ring Adoption
  • Curbing iPhone users' curiosity about the Samsung ecosystem
  • Strengthening the โ€œwalled gardensโ€ of different mobile ecosystems
  • A missed opportunity for openness?

    Some experts believe that Samsung could have taken advantage of the Galaxy Ring to:

  • Create a Samsung Health app for iOS
  • Attracting new users to its ecosystem
  • Demonstrate the benefits of its products to a wider audience
  • Fitbit, for example, still offers its app on the App Store, allowing its devices to run on both iOS and Android.

    The Galaxy Ring could have been a gateway to the Samsung universe for iPhone users. Unfortunately, that opportunity seems to be compromised.

    Samsung's decision to limit the Galaxy Ring's compatibility to Android raises questions about the future of wearables. As consumers crave more openness and flexibility, this restriction may well go against market expectations.

    It remains to be seen whether Samsung will reverse its decision or whether other manufacturers will seize this opportunity to offer more inclusive alternatives. In any case, this choice is likely to be debated in the coming months and could influence the evolution of the wearables market.

    SRQ Backlot